Ole Reissmann

About · Newsletter

THEFUTURE

When AI Meets Amateur Hour

Newsletter sent 1.7.2025 by oler

In this issue: Elitist panic over amateur writers. 93 AI journalism initiatives mapped out. The BBC goes all-in on generative AI. Model mayhem at OpenAI. And Hugging Face’s Florent Daudens on Software 3.0 and why we’re all becoming coders just by talking to machines.

What we’re talking about: The Washington Post wants to help readers write opinion pieces. A tool called Ember could guide the writing process, pointing out weak arguments or suggesting better structure. To me, it sounds like saying “democratizing voices” while whispering “we need cheap content”, but that’s beside the point.

Because it’s AI-assisted, we get elitist panic. “Will The Washington Post Embrace the AI Slush Pile?” asks Amanda Katz in The Atlantic. Her argument: Most opinions aren’t interesting, and AI can’t fix that—it only produces “the kind of writing I have spent my whole career trying to hold back.” At this point, you wonder who she dislikes more: AI, readers, or herself.

Even progressive tech publication The Verge puts “amateur writers” in its headline, as if helping people who aren’t professional opinion-havers structure their thoughts is somehow scandalous.

But more voices, better tools to express them? That doesn’t sound like a crisis to me. It might just be an interesting use case for AI.

(Funny enough, at the same time, professional journalists are seeking help from an app called Sophiana by journalist and newsfluencer Sophia Smith Galer to repackage their texts for vertical video.)

More on AI and writing: “AI is better than most humans at producing prose. In a couple years, it will be better than most ‘professional writers’ as well.” This is the first of 23 observations from Jasmine Sun, a writer and former product manager in San Francisco who’s researching AI.

Two more: “AI hallucinates, humans misremember. Yet neuroscience suggests that memory and imagination are one and the same. As Demis Hassabis’ PhD thesis found, amnesiacs make shoddy novelists.” And: “ChatGPT catches me in a lie approximately as often as I catch it.” The observations layer nicely, with a provocation or two thrown in. I really liked it.

Previously, I recommended an article arguing that the meaning of a piece of writing doesn’t depend on the identity of the author, and LLMs expose how the authority of the author was always a fiction. Another article concluded that readers now see text as fungible.

What else I’ve been reading:

AI & Journalism Links

AI for Newsrooms: Sergei Yakupov has collected 93 initiatives and 58 resources. (Previously shared: Kalle Pirhonen’s spreadsheet with 90+ tools and products from around the world.)

BBC launches generative AI features: ‘At a Glance’ summaries and ‘Style Assist’ to adapt and reformat stories so that they match house-style.

A plea for publishers to ditch their walled-garden AI approaches and embrace emerging open standards like Model Context Protocol. (Ben Werdmuller, werd.io)

Time spent on ChatGPT is approaching that spent on social platforms. (Coatue’s 2025 Market Report via Lucy Küng)

Initial US rulings, as expected, give AI training the green light. Some lawsuits against AI companies have been dismissed, with courts distinguishing between AI training (legal) and traditional piracy (still illegal). (Florent Daudens, HuggingFace)

Case Study on iterative prompt evaluation and improvement: A workflow for targeted prompting to refine AI-generated newsletter headlines. (Ashlyn Wang, Generative AI in the Newsroom)

A new report is called “No Turning Back: AI’s Growing Role in News”, but shows that newsrooms use AI cautiously, hoping for modest gains rather than disruptive transformation. (Felix Simon, Aspen Digital)

Illustrator Christoph Niemann confronts his fears about AI art. (New York Times Magazine)

Update: Last week’s Who’s Who in the German-Speaking LinkedIn Universe got a lot of attention—11k views on LinkedIn, 1.8k on my site. The response has been fantastic.

Making it a thing: If you haven’t read my 10 Facts Everyone Should Know About AI, I really think you should. It’s on my website, not on LinkedIn. And: More blogging is coming, and I’m calling it Summer of AI.

That’s risky: When AI in the newsroom still feels like a geeky side project. One of the things Florent Daudens shares in the next section. He thinks we’re all becoming coders, and that the biggest blocker to AI adoption is no longer the tech.

Three Questions with Florent Daudens

Too many ChatGPT models: If you are confused as everyone else about OpenAI’s lineup, you’re not alone. But there is a chart attributed to Andrej Karpathy making the rounds on Reddit and LinkedIn. tl;dr: Use GPT-4o for everything easy and fast, o3 for everything hard or important, GPT-4.1 for coding. If you like GPT-4.5 for creative writing, bad luck: it’s being phased out.


Hands on: I made Looping Claudie, a script that runs a snippet of text through a prompt with Claude, editing it over and over again. It’s micro-data refinement. Before each iteration, I ask if the facts still hold. If not, the model intervenes.

My first prompt was this:

Help me edit this text. Adjust the structure for clarity and impact. Your main goal is originality, sharpness, punch. Only reply with the final edit.

Which gave me outputs like this:

Last week detonated.

Who’s Who in the German-Speaking LinkedIn Universe for journalism and AI: 10k LinkedIn views, 1.7k website hits. Then 10 Facts Everyone Should Know About AI went nuclear.

The hunger is feral.

I’m feeding it raw. More posts coming. Scalpel-sharp. Zero fat.

Welcome to the Summer of AI.

Utter cringe—the sort of text that floods the ruins of Twitter these days. So I wrote some more prompts, trying to turn this into a polishing factory for prose. Still not perfect. It certainly is not very inventive, Jasmine Sun would call it uninventive. This was one of my better attempts:

You are a helpful editor. Transform this text to be more engaging and memorable. Better means: conversational and personal rather than performative, surprising without being gimmicky, delightful to read without educational arrogance. Avoid truncated "bro-speak" phrases, breathless hype, and artificial urgency. Instead, aim for natural flow and genuine enthusiasm. Maintain the original structure but polish for readability. Use US English. Reply only with the final edit.

Getting somewhere! Here’s a Google sheet with the original, compared to an edit with just the prompt and to Looping Claudie with four iterations.

Looping Claudie is loosely based on an experiment by sci-fi writer Robin Sloan. If you want to try it yourself, I’ve shared the Notebook. You’ll need a Claude API key, save it as “ANTHROPIC_API_KEY”, and grant the Notebook access to it (no, it’s not shared with me). Look for the “refinement_prompt” in the code. You can switch between the prompts by moving the # symbol (which indicates a comment) from one line to the other. Or try your own.

One more thing: If you’re reading about the viral MIT study that turned out to be a meta-commentary on how the public consumes scientific studies through summarization and AI, THEFUTURE told you about it a week ago.

This is THEFUTURE.

Subscribe to THEFUTURE

Get this newsletter in your inbox. For free.

The previous issue is The GenZ Reality Check Media Needs to Hear, the next issue is Journalism’s AI Challenge Isn’t Tech—It’s Purpose.